Office
of Biological and Environmental Research
DOE
Lowdose Radiation Program Workshop III
Abstract
_____________________________________________________________________
Title: Investigation of a Radiation-Induced
Bystander Effect Using Co-culturing
Protocols.
Authors:
Brian Ponnaiya, Gloria Jenkins-Baker, Mutian Zhang, Alan Bigelow,
Stephen Marino and Charles R. Geard.
Previous
studies in this laboratory using the charged particle microbeam
have demonstrated the induction of micronuclei in fibroblast
cells that were adjacent to alpha particle irradiated cells.
To determine the suitability of the co-culturing approach
to study the bystander effect, initial studies focused on
the detection of the induction of micronuclei in irradiated
and bystander fibroblasts.
Immortalized
human fibroblasts (BJ1-htert) were irradiated with 0,0.1 (~1
per nucleus),1 and 10 Gy a–particles (90 keV/mm) and
hit and bystander cells were examined for BrdU uptake and
micronuclei incidence at 24, 48 and 72 hours post irradiation.
As expected at 24 hours post irradiation there was a dose
dependent reduction in the number of BrdU positive cells in
the irradiated population (Figure 1). This was apparent at
48 and 72 hours as well. In addition, fibroblast bystander
cells also demonstrated small though consistent delays in
cell cycle progression.
Figure
1
Micronuclei frequencies observed in the irradiated and bystander
populations are presented in Table 1. Yields of micronuclei
in the irradiated populations were 2-4 fold higher than that
of controls. The peak frequency was observed in the populations
that received 1 Gy. The populations that received 10 Gy did
not have significantly higher yields of micronuclei, which
would be expected given the large delays in cell cycle progression
observed. Bystander cells also had increased micronuclei frequencies
at all doses. These increased yields were about 2 fold higher
that controls at all doses, which is similar to the observations
in the microbeam experiments. The similarities between these
results and those of the microbeam experiments indicate that
this is a suitable approach to study the bystander effect.
Table
1. Frequencies of micronuclei observed in co-cultured human
fibroblasts and bystanders following a-irradiation.
Having
detected the bystander effect in co-cultured fibroblasts,
experiments were then conducted to determine whether a similar
effect could be induced in co-cultured epithelial cells. Immortalized
retinal epithelial cells (RPE-htert) were seeded onto mylar
mylar rings and irradiated with 0,0.1,1 and 10 Gy a-particles
(90 keV/mm). Epithelial cells seeded onto transwells served
as bystander populations. Irradiated and bystander cells were
examined for BrdU uptake and micronuclei incidence at 24,
48 and 72 hours post irradiation.
There
was a dose dependent decrease in the number of cycling cells
in the irradiated populations at all times points. Interestingly,
unlike the bystander fibroblasts, the bystander epithelial
cells did not appear to be delayed in progression through
the cell cycle. Even at the earliest time point examined,
24 hours, there were no apparent differences between bystanders
to irradiated populations and controls. There was a 2-4 fold
increase in micronuclei yields in the irradiated populations,
with the exception of the population that received the highest
dose. Importantly, micronuclei frequencies in epithelial bystander
populations were not increased as were those seen in fibroblast
bystander populations. All of the epithelial bystanders had
frequencies of micronuclei comparable to that seen in the
controls. These data are at odds with microbeam results that
indicated the induction of micronuclei in bystander epithelial
cells.
Data
presented here indicate that the co-culturing techniques developed
in the laboratory are suitable for studying the bystander
effect and may be useful in examining details of the phenomenon
when used alone or in parallel with microbeam experiments.
Studies are ongoing with low LET charged particles and photon
sources to determine the relative significance of low dose
low LET radiations in influencing bystander cell responsiveness.
Return
to the top