Office
of Biological and Environmental Research
DOE
Lowdose Radiation Program Workshop III
Abstract
_____________________________________________________________________
Title: Transcriptional Repression of Clusterin
by the p53 Tumor Supressor Protein.
Authors:
Criswell, T., Klekov, D., Lavik, J.P., Isreal, S., Leskov,
K. and Boothman, D.A.
Institutions:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Laboratory of Molecular
Stress Responses, Case Western Reserve University and The
Ireland Cancer Center.
Recent
data indicate that the clusterin (CLU) gene/protein has both
cytoprotective as well as cytotoxic activities. Previous data
strongly suggested that the secretory form of the CLU protein
(sCLU) was cytoprotective; sCLU was induced after very low
nontoxic doses of ionizing radiation (IR: >0.02 Gy), doses
known to be growth stimulatory. In contrast, a nuclear form
of the CLU protein (nCLU) was induced by higher doses of IR
(>1 Gy) and elicited cytotoxic responses, including apoptotic
cell death. Thus, we proposed that CLU was a molecular death
switch.
However,
the regulation of the CLU mRNA after IR has not been investigated.
CLU mRNA expression and promoter activity was investigated
in MCF-7:WS8 breast cancer cells. Consistent with accumulation
of steady state sCLU protein levels, Northern blot analyses
revealed significant induction of CLU mRNA levels after >0.02
Gy at 48 h post-irradiation. Time-course analyses revealed
that CLU mRNA induction occurred relatively late after 0.02-10
Gy, with dramatic increases occurring 24-72 h post-irradiation.
Exposure of MCF-7 1403 cells (MCF-7:WS8 cells containing a
stably integrated 1403 bp CLU promoter-luciferase reporter
gene) with 2-10 Gy confirmed the delayed expression of CLU
mRNA after IR. Time-course analyses revealed significant (>7-fold)
induction of CLU promoter activity 24 h post-irradiation,
with maximal induction (>10-fold) at 72 h. CLU promoter
activity, mRNA accumulation, and increases in the steady state
of levels of sCLU protein confirmed the delayed nature of
induction of this gene after IR.
A
screen of human cancer cell lines for sCLU expression revealed
that loss of p53 function (cells with null or mutant p53)
led to higher levels of sCLU protein. Forced stable expression
of human papillomavirus E6 protein, which binds and results
in the degradation of p53, in human MCF-7:WS8 E6D breast cancer
cells resulted in slightly higher basal levels of sCLU, and
an increase in the overall levels of CLU mRNA steady state
levels after IR compared to wild-type cells. Similarly, exposure
of HCT116 p53-/- cells (cells in which p53 was somatically
knocked-out) to IR resulted in dramatically higher levels
(~30-fold) and faster induction (increases at 4 and 12 h were
noted) of sCLU mRNA and protein compared to wild-type HCT116
human colon cancer cells. In contrast, exposure of p21-/-
HCT116 cells (cells somatically knocked out for p21) to IR
resulted in a much lower sCLU mRNA and protein induction (~2-fold)
than in p53-/- HCT116 cells, levels similar to IR-exposed
wild-type HCT116 cells. Cell cycle analyses on control or
IR-exposed p53-/-, p21-/- or wild-type HCT116 cells revealed
that CLU protein induction was not cell cycle regulated. Induction
of the CLU gene or sCLU protein was not restricted to certain
phases of the cell cycle. The negative regulation of the cytoprotective
sCLU protein by p53 suggests that p53 down-regulates this
gene product to facilitate cell death. This work was supported
by DOE grant DE-FG02-99EQ62724 to DAB, and by a pre-doctoral
fellowship from the DOD to T.C.
Return
to the top